Experitor.

Stress-test expert evidence before the other side does.

Experitor runs a council of independent AI analysts over an expert report — your expert's draft, or the one just served on you — and returns verified, quote-grounded findings: admissibility exposure, internal contradictions, cross-examination lines, and a prioritised remediation list. In under an hour.

Run an evaluation See how it works First evaluation free · for qualified practitioners

Three ways legal teams use it

Every evaluation is graded against real admissibility standards: Makita reasoning transparency, Evidence Act s 79, and the expert witness codes of conduct — not generic writing feedback.

Harden

Your expert's draft

Find the weaknesses while they can still be fixed: unstated assumptions, unexposed reasoning, internal inconsistencies, code-of-conduct gaps. Output ends with an ordered remediation work list.

Attack

The other side's report

Identify what goes to admissibility and what goes to weight, with candidate cross-examination lines: the target opinion, the concessions to seek, and the passages to put to the witness.

Joint & responses

Conclave reports and replies

A disagreement map of what each dispute actually turns on, whose reasoning is exposed, and where an expert's conclave position has quietly moved from their primary report.

How it works

The same document, examined many ways — then adversarially checked before anything reaches you.

Independent specialist analysts

Separate AI analysts each examine one dimension: expertise and mandate, assumptions, methodology and reasoning, quantification, and compliance. A second model family reviews the whole document independently. Upload the brief and related reports and they're cross-referenced too.

Cross-model verification

Every discrete claim is adjudicated against the document text by a different model. Claims that fail verification are filtered out and shown separately — disagreement is surfaced, never averaged away.

Counsel-grade synthesis

Findings are deduplicated and confidence-tiered: points flagged independently by multiple analysts and verified rank highest. You receive one advice with evidence quotes, locations, implications, and fixes.

Built to be checked

Lawyers shouldn't take an AI's word for anything. Experitor is designed so you don't have to.

Pricing

Per evaluation, like any other disbursement — no subscription, no seats. One credit runs one full council evaluation of any report type, context documents included. Prices in AUD, exclusive of GST.

Single
A$345
one evaluation
Matter pack
A$900
three evaluations · A$300 each
Firm pack
A$2,750
ten evaluations · A$275 each

New accounts include one free evaluation. Sign in to get started, or contact us about firm deployments and BYO-key options.

What Experitor is not. Experitor produces AI-assisted analysis of the documents you upload, for use by qualified legal practitioners as one input among many. It is not legal advice, it has not seen the underlying evidence, and every finding must be verified against the source material before it is relied on, put to a witness, or filed. It does not draft expert opinions.